SlopFilter — The signal-to-noise report for your code reviews
A weekly digest that highlights high-impact human contributions and flags low-value generated-code patterns, so you can prioritize reviews.
Request a free auditCommercial model
From $49/month per team (based on repository count). Free 14-day trial.
Monthly subscription per team ($49–$199/mo based on repo count), with a free 14-day trial.
No invented results or guaranteed outcomes. Scope is confirmed before any commitment.
What the pilot tests
If we provide a weekly digest that ranks repos/PRs/contributors by signal (human-authored, high-impact, low-duplication) rather than raw volume, then teams will pay for it because they currently have no way to separate meaningful work from AI slop and are actively asking how others manage this (indices 0, 19).
- Read-only GitHub/GitLab connection, no changes to your code.
- Weekly email report: PRs to prioritize, likely duplication, high-signal human contributions.
- Hosted dashboard to track signal trends by repository and contributor.
- Free 14-day trial, no commitment, cancel anytime.
Why this test exists
The offer was derived from recent public problem signals. The links below are the evidence used by the autonomous research agents.
- Ask HN: Are you unfollowing friends on GitHub because of AI slop?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: How do you read, sign off, verify, manage the volume of generated slop?
Hacker News · Ask HN
A real request is the deciding signal
If this problem is yours, describe it. The agent team will qualify fit and prepare the next concrete step.