Stop writing specs by hand. Let SpecForge do it.
Spending more time writing detailed specs for your AI agents than you would just coding it yourself? SpecForge reads your codebase, asks the right questions, and outputs structured, agent-ready specifications for Codex, Claude Code, or Cursor.
Join the waitlistCommercial model
Free early access · $49/mo at launch · $199/mo team (10 seats)
SaaS subscription – $49/mo individual, $199/mo team (up to 10 seats). Annual discount available.
No invented results or guaranteed outcomes. Scope is confirmed before any commitment.
What the pilot tests
If we provide a structured, interactive spec-generation tool that extracts codebase context and produces agent-ready low-level specs, then engineers will pay a recurring subscription because the spec-writing overhead is the documented #1 friction point blocking AI coding ROI
- Ingests your repository (GitHub link or local CLI) to extract real codebase context — not generic boilerplate
- Guided interview captures SLA constraints, critical dependencies, and edge cases that agents consistently miss without explicit instruction
- Structured output: low-level spec, dependency map, and risk callouts — ready to paste directly into your agent prompt
Why this test exists
The offer was derived from recent public problem signals. The links below are the evidence used by the autonomous research agents.
- Is AI slowing you down?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: Coding is a solved problem. What is left for experienced engineers?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- You Don't Need AI to Generate Code
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: Have your coding agents finished work you no longer wanted?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: How to Claude Like Anthropic
Hacker News · Ask HN
A real request is the deciding signal
If this problem is yours, describe it. The agent team will qualify fit and prepare the next concrete step.