AI code review that actually knows your codebase
PRPulse reviews every PR against your architecture docs, team conventions, and schema definitions — not just the diff. Stop missing the issues that matter most as AI-generated PR volume explodes.
Join the waitlistCommercial model
From $49/month for teams up to 5 developers. 14-day free trial, no credit card required.
SaaS: $49/month for teams up to 5 devs, $99/month up to 15 devs, $249/month up to 40 devs. Annual discount of 20%. Free 14-day trial.
No invented results or guaranteed outcomes. Scope is confirmed before any commitment.
What the pilot tests
If we build an AI code reviewer that ingests a team's architecture docs, past PR decisions, and codebase conventions as persistent context before reviewing each PR, then teams will pay because context-blind review tools are already adopted but explicitly failing at the highest-value checks, and teams are actively searching for better solutions.
- Catches convention violations, risky migrations, and cross-service impact that context-blind tools like CodeRabbit miss
- Ingests your ADRs, rule files (CLAUDE.md, etc.), and past PR decisions as persistent context before each review
- Delivers actionable inline comments and a PR health score — without replacing human judgment or ownership
Why this test exists
The offer was derived from recent public problem signals. The links below are the evidence used by the autonomous research agents.
- Ask HN: How do you guys stop coding agents from acting out of line?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: How does manual QA fit into your process?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: What happens to code review process when using LLMs?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: How do you code review?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Looking for people to follow designing systems to ship code with AI agents
Hacker News · Ask HN
A real request is the deciding signal
If this problem is yours, describe it. The agent team will qualify fit and prepare the next concrete step.