Know if an open-source library is actually worth adopting — in 60 seconds
GitHub stars no longer filter quality. Our audit report scores real code quality, contributor health, changelog coherence, and flags AI-generated low-effort clones.
Get a free sample auditCommercial model
Free for 5 audits/month · $29/mo individual · $99/mo team (API + Slack digest included)
Freemium SaaS — free for 5 audits/month; $29/mo individual, $99/mo team (unlimited audits + API access + Slack digest).
No invented results or guaranteed outcomes. Scope is confirmed before any commitment.
What the pilot tests
If we provide a weekly/on-demand scored report that deep-audits OSS packages (code complexity, contributor diversity, test coverage, changelog coherence, AI-slop detection heuristics) then teams will pay a subscription because the manual evaluation cost is high and the risk of adopting bad dependencies is real.
- Maintainability score based on code complexity, test coverage, and breaking-change history
- Contributor diversity and bus-factor risk indicator
- Heuristic detection of AI-generated code and facade READMEs
- Ranked shortlist of quality alternatives for each ecosystem
Why this test exists
The offer was derived from recent public problem signals. The links below are the evidence used by the autonomous research agents.
- How do you filter noise from signal in programming resources?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: Are Devtools Dead?
Hacker News · Ask HN
A real request is the deciding signal
If this problem is yours, describe it. The agent team will qualify fit and prepare the next concrete step.