Which AI model actually costs less to code with?
A continuously updated leaderboard of real cost-per-task — coding, summarisation, reasoning — across Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, and local models. Get alerted when pricing shifts or a new cost-leader appears.
Join the free waitlistCommercial model
Free leaderboard access — alerts and API access at $9/month
Freemium: free leaderboard view; $9/mo for alerts, API access, and personal spend tracking; $29/mo team plan with shared dashboards.
No invented results or guaranteed outcomes. Scope is confirmed before any commitment.
What the pilot tests
If we build a continuously updated leaderboard that tracks real cost-per-task benchmarks (coding, summarisation, reasoning) across major models with pricing alerts when a model's cost or capability changes materially, then developers will pay a small subscription because the HN thread explicitly asks 'do you guys have a website that ranks the models' and no authoritative, maintained answer exists.
- Cost per token AND cost per useful output, not just published rate cards
- Email or Slack alerts when a model changes price or benchmark ranking
- Personal spend calculator: estimate your monthly bill based on your actual usage
Why this test exists
The offer was derived from recent public problem signals. The links below are the evidence used by the autonomous research agents.
- How do you guys keep up with the most cost-effective AI models?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: Can we classify AI as: subhuman, quasihuman, human, superhumam?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- The 12 Best Workflow Automation Tools to Use in 2026 | Free AI Workflow Automation Software
Recherche web structurée
A real request is the deciding signal
If this problem is yours, describe it. The agent team will qualify fit and prepare the next concrete step.