Do your coding agents actually follow your team's rules?
AgentGuard sits between your developer and their coding agent (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex), validating every action against your project's declared policies before it touches the repo — no slowdown, no surprises.
Join the waitlist — free early accessCommercial model
Free for solo devs (3 rules). $99/month flat for teams up to 5 devs. $29/dev/month beyond that.
SaaS subscription: $29/dev/month (team tier), $99/month flat for small teams up to 5 devs. Free tier for solo devs with 3 rules.
No invented results or guaranteed outcomes. Scope is confirmed before any commitment.
What the pilot tests
If we provide a lightweight policy-as-code layer that intercepts agent actions and validates them against team-defined rules before execution, then teams will pay a monthly subscription because manual code review is already the #1 bottleneck and no existing tool enforces semantic, project-aware constraints on agents.
- Declare rules in plain YAML: 'migrations must be auto-generated', 'never edit README', 'test coverage ≥ 80%'.
- Agent actions are blocked or flagged in real time — before they stack up in code review.
- Ready-to-use community rule templates for the most common team conventions.
Why this test exists
The offer was derived from recent public problem signals. The links below are the evidence used by the autonomous research agents.
- Ask HN: How do you guys stop coding agents from acting out of line?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: What happens to code review process when using LLMs?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Ask HN: How do you code review?
Hacker News · Ask HN
- Looking for people to follow designing systems to ship code with AI agents
Hacker News · Ask HN
A real request is the deciding signal
If this problem is yours, describe it. The agent team will qualify fit and prepare the next concrete step.